America’s Frontline Doctors (AFLDS) – https://americasfrontlinedoctors.org/
AFLDS is a non-partisan, not-for-profit organization. Our growing community of member physicians come from across the country representing a range of medical disciplines and practical experience on the front lines of medicine. Our programs focus on a number of critical issues including:
– Providing Americans with science-based facts about COVID-19
– Protecting physician independence from government overreach
– Combating the pandemic using evidence-based approaches without compromising Constitutional freedoms
– Fighting medical cancel culture and media censorship
– Advancing healthcare policies that protect the physician-patient relationship
– Expanding COVID-19 treatment options for all Americans who need them
– Strengthening the voices of front-line doctors in the national healthcare conversation.
WHAT WE BELIEVE
AFLDS believes that the American people have the right to accurate information using trusted data derived from decades of practical experience, not politicized science and Big Tech-filtered public health information. We support devolving critical public health decision-making away from Washington and closer tolocal communities and the physicians that serve them. We are steadfastly committed to protecting the physician-patient relationship. We support incorporating front-line and actively practicing physicians into the nation’s healthcare policy conversation.
We believe that organizations like the AMA and other sources of medical information have lost their independence and should be treated with greater skepticism. We believe that safe and effective, over-the-counter COVID preventative and early treatment options should be made available to all Americans who need them. We reject mandatory government lockdowns and restrictions not supported by scientific evidence. We support focused care for the nation’s at-risk population, including seniors and the immune-compromised. Most of all, America’s Frontline Doctors is committed to maintaining the physician-patient relationship in the face of government encroachment. We are not the media – please share what you learn here.
Read their article, “10 Medical Facts regarding the Covid 19 Experimental Vaccines” by Dr. Shelley Cole, Medical Director of AFLDS, here: https://americasfrontlinedoctors.org/covid19/vaccines/ [accessed 17/07/2021], or download a copy here [PDF, 3 pages].
Image from: https://americasfrontlinedoctors.org/
Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS) – https://aapsonline.org/
An article published by the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons [AAPS], reporting on a survey amongst 700 physicians, notes that:
Neither survey represents a random sample of all American physicians, but the AAPS survey shows that physician support for the mass injection campaign is far from unanimous.
“It is wrong to call a person who declines a shot an ‘anti-vaxxer,’” states AAPS executive director Jane Orient, M.D. “Virtually no physicians are ‘anti-antibiotics’ or ‘anti-surgery,’ whereas all are opposed to treatments that they think are unnecessary, more likely to harm than to benefit an individual patient, or inadequately tested.”
Read the article at: https://aapsonline.org/majority-of-physicians-decline-covid-shots-according-to-survey/ [published 16/06/2021, accessed 02/07/2021], or download a copy of the article [PDF, 2 pages].
Covid19 Assembly – https://www.covid19assembly.org/
The Covid19 Assembly is deeply concerned that the Covid-19-related restrictions on normal life are disproportionate and were brought in based on unscientific information. These restrictions need to be brought to an immediate end with a thorough investigation carried out to ensure this situation never happens again.
Our goals are:
- All current restrictions are ended and no further disproportionate measures are taken with regard to Covid-19.
- All information used to justify the pandemic response is fully re-examined, scrutinized and reviewed for accuracy.
- Proper checks and balances are put in place to make sure no similarly disproportionate measures are ever taken in in future, should a similar public health situation arise.
We are working to achieve this through a number of initiatives:
- Thorough investigations into data used to justify government decision making. Our first project in this area will be a detailed investigation into all official Covid-19 deaths and whether any of these have been misattributed.
- Creation & distribution of accurate, accessible information in formats designed for the average person who may be questioning one or more aspects of the pandemic or response to it.
- Fostering cooperation between groups, organizations and individuals who share the same views and sharing knowledge and best practices with them – both within the UK and internationally.
Image from: https://www.covid19assembly.org/what-we-do-2/ [accessed 23/07/2021].
Declaration of Canadian Physicians for Science and Truth – https://canadianphysicians.org/
We are a broad and diverse group of Canadian physicians from across Canada who are sending out this urgent declaration to the Colleges of Physicians and Surgeons of our various Provinces and Territories and to the Public at large, whom we serve.
On April 30, 2021, Ontario’s physician licensing body, the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario (CPSO), issued a statement forbidding physicians from questioning or debating any or all of the official measures imposed in response to COVID-19. 1
The CPSO then went on to threaten physicians with punishment – investigations and disciplinary action.
We regard this recent statement of the CPSO to be unethical, anti-science and deeply disturbing.
As physicians, our primary duty of care is not to the CPSO or any other authority, but to our patients.
When we became physicians, we pledged to put our patients first and that our ethical and professional duty is always first toward our patients. The CPSO statement orders us to violate our duty and pledge to our patients in the following ways…
The group of over 500 Canadian and international physicians go on to list the violations as follows:
1. Denial of the Scientific Method itself,
2. Violation of our Pledge to use Evidence-Based Medicine for our patients,
3. Violation of Duty of Informed Consent.
Doctors 4 Covid Ethics – https://doctors4covidethics.medium.com/
Doctors and Scientists Write to the European Medicines Agency, Warning of COVID-19 Vaccine Dangers for a Third Time – https://doctors4covidethics.medium.com/doctors-and-scientists-write-to-the-european-medicines-agency-warning-of-covid-19-vaccine-dangers-edfebb0419a7
Ahead of European Green Certificate (vaccine passport) vote in the European Parliament on April 28, the experts warn that cardinal symptoms of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST) dominate the list of adverse reactions to COVID-19 vaccines.
Download the email to Executive Director of European Medicines Agency (EMA) here [PDF, 4 pages], originally sent on 20/04/2021 [accessed 26/04/2021].
Members of the European Parliament Served with Notices of Liability for COVID-19 Vaccine Harms and Deaths on April 20, 2021 – https://doctors4covidethics.medium.com/members-of-the-european-parliament-served-with-notices-of-liability-for-covid-19-vaccine-harms-and-a1630dd77dfd
On April 20, all following Members of the European Parliament were served with notices of liability, advising that they may be held personally liable for harm and death caused by implementation of a Digital Green Certificate (Vaccine Passport), to be voted upon in the European Parliament on April 28, 2021.
Download the list of EU parliament members notified here [PDF, 52 pages], originally sent on 20/04/2021 [accessed 26/04/2021].
Great Barrington Declaration (GBD) – https://gbdeclaration.org/
As infectious disease epidemiologists and public health scientists we have grave concerns about the damaging physical and mental health impacts of the prevailing COVID-19 policies, and recommend an approach we call Focused Protection.
Download the Great Barrington Declaration here [PDF, 4 pages], originally signed on 04/10/2020, which has a current total of 42,629 signatures from medical practitioners, 14,015 signatures from medical and public health scientists, and 781,011 signatures from concerned citizens [accessed 19/04/2021].
Image from: https://gbdeclaration.org/view-signatures/ [accessed 23/07/2021].
HART Group – Health Advisory & Recovery Team – https://www.hartgroup.org/
HART is a group of highly qualified UK doctors, scientists, economists, psychologists and other academic experts.
We call on everyone on all sides of this debate to acknowledge the great challenges the Government faces in tackling this disease. To acknowledge, also, how frightened people are and the tremendous responsibility that comes with managing a public health crisis of this nature.
We must now bridge the gaps in policy areas where there is obvious disagreement. We should try to avoid bias and follow the rapidly emerging evidence to guide us. If we listen and communicate clearly and respectfully with each other we can find the common ground.
Our group of scientists, medics and public health experts have put together this rigorously and widely researched document… Moving forward, we would recommend the following steps:
Reinstate the existing pandemic planning policies from 2019, pending a detailed review of the policies adopted in 2020. Look to countries and states which did things differently. There should be a clear commitment from the Government that we will never again lockdown.
Stop mass testing healthy people. Return to the principles of respiratory disease diagnosis (the requirement of symptoms) that were well researched and accepted before 2020. Manufacturers’ guidelines state that these tests are designed to assist the diagnosis of symptomatic patients, not to ‘find’ disease in otherwise healthy people.
Stop all mask mandates. They are psychologically and potentially physically harmful whilst being clinically unproven to stop disease spread in the community and may themselves be a transmission risk.
Vaccination. Abandon the notion that vaccine certification is desirable and that children should be vaccinated. There is no logical or ethical argument for either.
Devise a public education programme to help redress the severe distortions in beliefs around disease transmission, likelihood of dying and possible treatment options. A messaging style based on a calm presentation of facts is urgently needed.
A full public enquiry into the extent to which severe/fatal COVID-19 is spread in hospitals and care homes. There is stark recent evidence on this from Public Health Scotland and if true for the rest of the UK, there needs to be better segregation of COVID-19 patients and staff within these settings.
More funding and investigation of treatments for COVID-19, instead of only focusing on vaccination as a strategy. Given the high rates of hospital transmission, encourage a drive for more early treatment-at-home using some of the protocols discussed herein.
Divert funds. The not inconsiderable money saved from ceasing testing programmes can be diverted to much needed areas, such as mental health, treatment research and an increase in hospital capacity and staffing. The vast debts accrued during 2020 will also need to be paid off, a fact that seems to be worryingly absent from economic recovery plans.
New Zealand Doctors Speaking Out with Science (NZDSOS) – https://nzdsos.com/
NZDSOS is a group of doctors, dentists and scientists who are concerned about the safety of the roll-out of the Pfizer vaccine in New Zealand, and the lack of balance in the information being presented, so the public and our patients may make a truly informed choice.
Given the lack of long-term safety data and the lack of safety data regarding reproductive health for the Pfizer vaccine, we draw attention to the lack of risk-benefit analysis particularly for younger people.
Furthermore, given the availability of effective alternative treatments and the low risk of mortality and morbidity from COVID-19, particularly in the young, the benefit of this vaccine is unknown. We have respectfully raised these issues with Medsafe and our governing bodies.
6,250 signatories, including New Zealand doctors, nurses, scientists and citizens, and international heatlcare professionals and citizens have signed the NZDSOS Declaration so far, standing for adhering to the Nuremberg Code and informed consent when it comes to covid vaccines.
PANDA ~ Pandemic Data & Analytics – https://www.pandata.org/
PANDA Pandemics ~ Data & Analytics is a multidisciplinary group seeking to inform policy by considering explanations that allow us to count the human cost of COVID-19 responses globally.
A group of multi-disciplinary professionals, who perceived the global reaction to Covid, and lockdown in particular, as overwrought and damaging to the point of causing a great tear in the fabric of society, established PANDA (Pandemics Data & Analytics) in April 2020. As a politically and economically independent organisation, PANDA seeks to develop science-based explanations and test them against international data. Policy recommendations for governments and other institutions can be developed from these. PANDA stands for open science and rational debate, for replacing flawed science with good science and for retrieving liberty and prosperity from the clutches of a dystopian “new normal”.
See PANDA’s live, searchable data dashboard here: https://app.powerbi.com/view?r=eyJrIjoiMGVjYjhkMjMtMzhjMy00OWRkLWJlNWItNjM0NzI0NjhiNTlkIiwidCI6IjlkZWYwNTBlLTExMDUtNDk1ZC1iNzUzLWRhOGRiZTc5MGVmNyJ9 [accessed 25/06/2021].
Principia Scientific International – https://principia-scientific.com/
PSI aims to promote best scientific practice in the community; to defend the interests of the members, to educate specialists and non-specialists about new theories and refinements in best practice; to disseminate amongst our members, domestically and internationally, news and views for the betterment of their knowledge and performance.
Our specific objectives include:
Promoting the broadest possible dissemination of impartial science information untainted by politics or corporate interest in as many languages and to as many nations as possible
Advancing independent, non-affiliated scientific discoveries unencumbered by political ideology or corporate financial interest.
Providing impartial scientific advice and evidence to international policymakers, news outlets and the general public.
Being a cost effective ebook publishing service to our members at preferential rates for their personal and career advancement.
Offering financial support either by grant or loan, to authors in science who we believe have potential to advance the association’s core values.
Discouraging inappropriate or unconscionable scientific methods by exposing them where they are proven to exist.
Publicizing our successes via the Internet and mainstream media as appropriate (including television, books, radio, film).
One of their articles, “Open Letter to UK Politicians on COVID Skullduggery” is a good summary, with numerous links to evidence and research papers, of the numerous flaws associated with covid vaccines and the widespread untruths perpetrated about covid.
See: https://principia-scientific.com/open-letter-to-uk-politicians-on-covid-skullduggery/ [published 07/07/2021, accessed 08/07/2021], or download a copy here [PDF, 6 pages].
World Doctor’s Alliance (WDA) – https://worlddoctorsalliance.com/
An independent non-profit alliance of doctors, nurses, healthcare professionals and staff around the world who have united in the wake of the Covid-19 response chapter to share experiences with a view to ending all lockdowns and related damaging measures and to re-establish universal health determinance of psychological and physical wellbeing for all humanity.
WDA represents a diverse range of opinions of health care professionals and does not have a consensus of opinions on the origin of covid-19 or the political ramifications of the lockdown per se. WDA is however committed to debate the causes of harm resulting from the coronavirus act measures and to raise issues that expose harmful medical and life limiting practices detrimental to the well being of all living men women and children.
Download their Open Letter here [PDF, 19 pages] regarding their views against the extreme covid responses taken by governments and what they believe should have happened in response to covid [updated 13/04/2021, accessed 19/04/21].
Image from: https://worlddoctorsalliance.com/ [accessed 23/07/2021].
In addition, WDA published an evidence based science report entitled “Global Report – 2019 n-CoV novel coronavirus – Summary of Facts“, stating that “International experts suggest that up to 90% COVID cases could be false positives”. Read the 73-page report here: http://online.anyflip.com/inblw/ufbs/mobile/index.html [published September 2020, accessed 06/05/2021].
Image from: http://online.anyflip.com/inblw/ufbs/mobile/index.html [accessed 23/07/2021].
Image of Dr. Martin Kulldorff, Dr. Sunetra Gupta, and Dr. Jay Bhattacharya from https://gbdeclaration.org/