For those about to take a covid vaccine: Facts you need to know.

Covid vaccines do not stop you ‘catching’ covid, transmission to others, hospitalisations or death.

From a UK government’s Public Health England NHS leaflet about ‘Covid Vaccination’: “We do not yet know whether it will stop you from catching and passing on the virus. So, it is important to follow the guidance in your local area to protect those around you.Download a copy of the leaflet here [PDF, 12 pages].

A scientific paper published in December 2021 in The Lancet entitled “Disentangling post-vaccination symptoms from early COVID-19” states:

“Post-vaccination symptoms per se cannot be differentiated from COVID-19 with clinical robustness, either using symptom profiles or machine-derived models. Individuals presenting with systemic symptoms post-vaccination should be tested for SARS-CoV-2 or quarantining, to prevent community spread.” [our emphasis]

In other words, vaccinated individuals are suffering so-called covid symptoms after vaccination and are testing positive for covid (via the flawed PCR or LFT), and these symptoms are almost exactly the same as those testing negative for covid after vaccination. There is some contortion of facts in this paper, in an attempt to fit the prevailing narrative. For example, they never mention the elephants in the room, which are that ‘covid’ is not accurately tested or diagnosed by PCR/LFT testing, that the covid vaccines are causing ‘covid’ not preventing it, or that ‘covid’ may be caused by something else altogether (and not a ‘virus’).

Read the full paper here: [published 01/12/2021, accessed 09/12/2021], or download the paper here [PDF, 10 pages].

It has been reported that covid vaccine recipients have tested positive for covid, for example an article by reports that over 500 covid vaccine recipients have been admitted to UK hospitals, having caught coronavirus after their vaccines!

See: [published 01/05/2021, accessed 02/05/2021], or download the report here [PDF, 2 pages]. The article, without reference to any scientific evidence, claims or implies that these vaccine recipients must have caught covid some other way – like most mainstream media, they refuse to discuss or admit to any correlations between the vaccines and disease or death.

An official Public Health England (PHE) report entitled “SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern and variants under investigationin England – Technical briefing 17 – 25 June 2021”, shows that up to 18 June 2021, that of the 117 ‘covid deaths’ (deaths within 28 days of a positive covid test) in the previous week, 70 were vaccinated (either once or twice) while only 44 were unvaccinated.

Table: From PHE report “SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern and variants under investigation in England – Technical briefing 17 – 25 June 2021, page 14.

See the full report here: [published 25/06/2021, accessed 26/06/2021], or download the full report here [PDF, 38 pages].

Indeed, over 10,000 people who have been fully vaccinated in the USA have been reported by the CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) as ‘breakthrough infections’ (those which appear two or more weeks AFTER the second shot). See: [published 26/05/2021, accessed 24/06/2021].

Another report from the USA notes how the CDC is making changes to how they report the high number of “breakthrough” covid cases, so as to hide the fact that there are such a high proportion of these. See: [published 07/05/2021, accessed 0/05/2021], or download a copy here [PDF, 4 pages].

In fact, it’s beginning to look like vaccines are actually killing people. From the UK government’s own report, published by SAGE, entitled “SPI-M-O: Summary of further modelling of easing restrictions – Roadmap Step 2, 31 March 2021”:

32. The resurgence in both hospitalisations and deaths is dominated by those that have received two doses of the vaccine [our bold], comprising around 60% and 70% of the wave respectively. This can be attributed to the high levels of uptake in the most at-risk age groups, such that immunisation failures account for more serious illness than unvaccinated individuals. This is discussed further in paragraphs 55 and 56….

56. This shows that most deaths and admissions in a post-Roadmap resurgence are in people who have received two vaccine doses, even without vaccine protection waning or a variant emerging that escapes vaccines. This is because vaccine uptake has been so high in the oldest age groups (modelled here at 95% in the over 50-year olds).
There are therefore 5% of over 50-year olds who have not been vaccinated, and 95% x 10% = 9.5% of over 50-year olds who are vaccinated but, nevertheless, not protected against death. This is not the result of vaccines being ineffective, merely uptake being so high [our bold].

Of course, it is IMPOSSIBLE to state that the majority of hospitalisations and deaths (of newly VACCINATED people) are somehow NOT due to the vaccines – how do they know? Has this been adequately investigated? Have autopsies been conducted amongst deceased vaccine recipients? The answer is NO! Thus they cannot assume hospitalisations and deaths are NOT from vaccines!

View the roadmap report here: [accessed 02/05/2021], or download a copy of the roadmap here [PDF, 23 pages].

Image source:

AdaptNation, following on from an article in UK Column, makes the point that: “Correlation [between vaccine rollouts and increased deaths] does NOT EQUAL causation, but it would be negligent and anti-scientific to not investigate these correlations.” They go on to say:

The above graph pulls data from today’s [02/02/2021] ONS Weekly Deaths report and PHE’s Coronavirus dashboard.
80-90% of over 80’s and 50%+ of over 70 year olds have received a first dose of one of the COVID-19 vaccines.
💉 Said another way, the super majority of the most vulnerable to severe acute respiratory infection and/or vaccine injury have had at least one interaction with the experimental biologics – during the natural peaking of the Total Mortality in England/UK.
Autumn/Winter Lockdowns bookmark the divergence of Total Mortality from the 5 Year Average. Not a good story so far…
😷 All the while, robust laws on public masking, public social distancing, and a handicapped healthcare service due to onerous COVID policies.
❓How about we layer in these inputs and changes into the analysis, versus exclusively looking at data derived from the PCR Testing campaign?
🧐 Let’s be clear, there WILL be a post-mortem on the last 12 months at some point. Honest analysis and considering the impacts of all variables will be deeply scrutinised. The problem is, it will be long after the horse as bolted, and once the damage has been done.
❗️I think it’s time we see the Post-Vaccine Death figures for the UK – like the US are doing (ish). Assuming the data are non-dramatic and encouraging regarding short-term safety, it would help TREMENDOUSLY to have transparent data shared ASAP.
No one wants there to be a problem. We have the data – i.e. deaths of those who have had a vaccine dose within 28 days. So, let’s get sharing, and let’s allay the concerns and dismiss the hypotheses… #FactsNotFear

DATA SOURCES: ONS Weekly Deaths Data & PHE Coronavirus Dashboard, 2nd Feb 2021

Read the AdaptNation article here: [published 04/02/2021, accessed 02/05/2021] and the UK Column article here: [published 02/02/2021, accessed 02/05/2021].

There are many more adverse reactions and deaths from covid vaccines than are reported in mainstream media.

Virginia Stoner writes about the huge increase in deaths reported via the VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System) database in the USA since the rollout of covid vaccines, compared to the last three decades of reported vaccine deaths. See: [published 04/05/2021, accessed 15/05/2021], or download a copy of her article here [PDF, 9 pages].

Image from:

Several analysts have noted how covid vaccinations are many more times likely to cause hospitalisations or deaths, compared to flu vaccinations. For example in the USA, up to 30 April 2021, analysis from the VAERS database reveals that for adults over 18 years, hospitalisations are 28 more times likely from covid vaxes than from flu vaxxes, and deaths are 141 more times likely from covid vaxxes than flu vaxxes! See: [published 07/05/2021].

Image from:

The UK MHRA’s Yellow Card Reporting System publishes a weekly report covering adverse reactions to ‘approved’ COVID-19 vaccines – See: [accessed 12/05/2021]. Download the weekly report ending 21/04/2021 [PDF, 18 pages].

The table below shows UK MHRA Yellow Card data, indicating that from 08 December 2020 to 28 April 2021, a total of 755,757 adverse events have been reported after covid vaccines (including serious, life-threatening side effects and permanent disability), as well as 1,102 deaths, in the UK alone, with many more reported worldwide.

Source for data in table:

For detailed lists of all adverse reactions, including deaths, reported to the UK’s Yellow Card scheme up to 28 April 2021, see:

For the latest statistics on covid vaccine injuries and deaths, according to the official, governmental vaccine adverse events reporting databases, see: monitors VAERS data from the USA, as well as MHRA data from the UK, and EudraVigilence data from Europe.

For example, this article reports on the high number of adverse events and deaths in the USA, as reported on VAERS: [published 01/05/2021, accessed 02/05/2021].

They also note that it appears that the CDC may be withholding data, as the USA numbers don’t correlate with other statistics.

The video below tracks weekly deaths (per 10,000) in the form of actual deaths and expected deaths (red lines), with deaths after vaccinations started (blue line), for many countries, for October 2020 to late April 2021. Although the blue line occasionally dips below the red line, in the vast majority of cases, deaths have significantly increased following covid vaccinations (evidenced by the blue line moving above the red line) [accessed 16/05/2021].

Video: Impact of COVID vaccinations on Mortality:

Various websites keep records of posts of covid vaccine side effects and deaths, including this website, which started out monitoring the effects of HPV vaccines, but has since expanded to monitor the effects of covid vaccines too.

See: [scroll down below their map for individual cases – updated regularly, accessed 11/05/2021], or download a copy of page 1 of the records here – it’s long! [PDF, 64 pages].

A number of social media groups have been created for victims of covid vaccines and their families, where members report and discuss adverse events, with photographs, and deaths. Most notably, one group on Facebook was removed by Facebook after it had over 100,000 members.

Other groups continue to run on various social media platforms such as Telegram, including ‘Covid Vaccine Victims‘, which already has over 112,000 members: [accessed 25/06/2021], ‘Covid Vaccine Injuries‘, with over 17,000 members: [accessed 25/06/2021], and ‘mRNA Death Toll‘, with over 12,000 members: [accessed 25/06/2021].

Images from:

It is widely accepted that the main, official, government vaccine adverse event reporting databases have as few as only 1%-10% of all adverse events and deaths, and there are some discrepancies between the three major vaccine adverse reporting systems in the USA, Europe and UK, confirming under-reporting for some or all, especially VAERS in the USA.

An article in GreenMedInfo states:

According to Oxford University’s global Covid-19 vaccine tracker, as of March 27th, the US has administered over 136 million doses, which accounts for about 25 percent of all Covid-19 vaccines administered worldwide. On the other hand, the EU nations have only administered 66 million doses — less than a half compared to the US. In addition, the US vaccination rate is now approximately 41 per 100 Americans. EU nations have individually vaccinated 17 per 100 citizens or less. Therefore, why is there such an enormous discrepancy of adverse vaccine reactions between the US and EU? The EU is reporting a 0.2 percent adverse reaction rate whereas the US is claiming only 0.03 percent, almost a ten-fold difference.

Various studies have estimated that only between 1 to 10 percent of vaccine injuries are reported in VAERS. In the past, the CDC has relied upon the conservative 10 percent estimate, which may account for the ten-fold discrepancy in adverse Covid-19 vaccine events in the EU and US. A 2011 Harvard study in collaboration with the Federal Agency for Health Care Research has estimated actual adverse event reporting may be as low as 1 percent. The study states,

“Adverse events from drugs and vaccines are common, but underreported. Although 25% of ambulatory patients experience an adverse drug event, less than 0.3% of all adverse drug events and 1-13% of serious events are reported to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Likewise, fewer than 1% of vaccine adverse events are reported.”

Read the full article here: [published 29/03/2021, accessed 28/04/2021], or download a copy of the article here [PDF, 3 pages].

There are at least 10 mechanisms by which covid vaccines will cause cross-reactions, disease or death, in the months and years to come.

Dr Sherri Tenpenny [of Tenpenny Integrative Medical Center] outlines 10 mechanisms of cross reactivity and injury of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein antigen and the anti-Spike-antibody from the mRNA experimental injections of Pfizer and Moderna biologic agents. She also outlines similar injury effects from the Johnson & Johnson (J&J) and AstraZeneca shots which use an adenovirus to deliver the spike protein into the cells.

These experimental injections have not been tested long term, nor tested for cancer causing, or effects on fertility which are all very important issues that should be tested for.

View the video at: [published 29/03/2021, accessed 01/05/2021].

In this video clip, Dr. Byram W. Bridle lists the main ways that spike proteins (the main immune system stimulant in covid vaccines) are essentially toxins and are known to cause blood clotting and bleeding, and thus heart problems, strokes, heart attacks and neurological disorders, and that the vaccine ingredients do not stay in the upper arm at the injection site, but are carried around the body in the bloodstream, accumulate in certain organs, and can cross the blood-brain barrier, which is also very dangerous.

This has now come out as a result of three studies, a bio-distribution study from Japan, another study amongst healthcare workers who had been given covid vaccines, and a study amongst breastfeeding mothers which shows they pass vaccine toxins to their babies and this is causing blood disorders in the babies.

He concludes that covid vaccines are toxic, will cause numerous illnesses and deaths, and possibly even infertility in recipients, and should never be given to children, babies or anyone not vulnerable to covid. We would add that therefore current covid vaccines should not be given to anyone, as they are obviously dangerous, and the vaccine injury databases across the world are proving this, even though we know not all vaccine injuries and deaths are reported correctly.

View the video at: [published 31/05/2021, accessed 01/06/2021].

Clinical, experimental trials for current covid vaccines continue until 2022 to 2024, so vaccine recipients are essentially trial participants.

According to a recent report published by CTIAP (Centre territorial d’Information indépendante et d’Avis pharmaceutiques) based on data published on the European Medicines Agency (EMA) website, covid vaccine trials will continue as follows:

The BioNTech/Pfizer vaccine received … European conditional marketing authorization on December 21, 2020. And the deadline for filing “confirmation” of efficacy, safety, and tolerability of this vaccine is “December 2023.”

The Moderna vaccine was granted marketing authorization on January 6, 2021. The deadline for filing “confirmation” of efficacy, safety, and tolerability of the vaccine is “December 2022” at the earliest.

AstraZeneca’s vaccine was granted marketing authorization on January 29, 2021. The deadline for filing “confirmation” of efficacy, safety, and tolerability of the vaccine is “March 2024.””

The Janssen [Johnson & Johnson] vaccine was granted conditional European marketing authorization on March 11, 2021. The deadline for submitting “confirmation” of the vaccine’s efficacy, safety and tolerance is “December 2023.”

See article on this: [published 22/04/2021, accessed 01/05/2021].

An editorial article in the British Medical Journal entitled ‘Covid-19 vaccines and treatments: we must have raw data, now’ laments about the lack of transparency with data from covid vaccine trials, noting that vaccine manufacturers have been resistant to publishing data, and may publish some towards the end of the vaccine trials or afterwards:

“Pfizer has indicated that it will not begin entertaining requests for trial data until May 2025, 24 months after the primary study completion date, which is listed on as 15 May 2023 (NCT04368728).

The lack of access to data is consistent across vaccine manufacturers.16 Moderna says data “may be available … with publication of the final study results in 2022.”18 Datasets will be available “upon request and subject to review once the trial is complete,” which has an estimated primary completion date of 27 October 2022 (NCT04470427).

As of 31 December 2021, AstraZeneca may be ready to entertain requests for data from several of its large phase III trials.19 But actually obtaining data could be slow going. As its website explains, “timelines vary per request and can take up to a year upon full submission of the request.”20

See: [published 19/01/2022, accessed 20/01/2022], or download a copy of the article here [PDF, 7 pages].

For example, this statement appears on the website for Moderna’s Clinical Trial Data:

The Moderna COVID‑19 Vaccine has not been approved or licensed by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), but has been authorized for emergency use by FDA, under an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA), to prevent Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID‑19) for use in individuals 18 years of age and older. There is no FDA-approved vaccine to prevent COVID‑19.

The EUA for the Moderna COVID‑19 Vaccine is in effect for the duration of the COVID‑19 EUA declaration justifying emergency use of the product, unless the declaration is terminated or the authorization is revoked sooner.

They go on to discuss the three phases of the clinical trial of Moderna’s covid vaccine, and state that Phase II and Phase III trials are ongoing. See: [accessed 15/05/2021], or download a copy of the text from their webpage here [PDF, 6 pages].

In their ‘Vaccination Provider Factsheet‘, downloadable from their website listed above, they specifically state:

The Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has declared a public health emergency that justifies the emergency use of drugs and biological products during the COVID-19 Pandemic. In response, the FDA has issued an EUA [Emergency Use Authorization] for the unapproved product, Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine, for active immunization to prevent COVID-19 in individuals 18 years of age and older. FDA issued this EUA, based on ModernaTX, Inc.’s request and submitted data.

Download a copy of Moderna’s Vaccination Provider Factsheet here [PDF, 24 pages].

The claimed high efficacy in covid vaccine trials are based on a small number of participants with mild covid symptoms, and in reality is ‘vanishingly tiny’.

For example, for the Pfizer vaccine trial, around half of the almost 40,000 trial participants were allegedly given the Pfizer vaccine, and the other half given a placebo.

The claimed 90% efficacy of the Pfizer vaccine announced in November 2020 related to the fact that 90% of the around 100 or so people who got mild covid symptoms – from the original 40,000 – came from the placebo group. That’s it! Read it again! See: [published 09/11/2020, accessed 01/05/2021].

Image from:

This article explains in more depth the magic tricks employed by vaccine manufacturers in calculating their claimed high efficacy for their experimental vaccine trials – See: [published 23/12/2020, accessed 02/05/2021], or download a copy of the article here [PDF, 10 pages]. The author notes that for the Pfizer covid vaccine trial, for example, the true efficacy was less than 1%, and not the [later] reported 95%. This is how they do it:

The absolute risk of developing COVID 19 symptoms without the vaccine is supposedly 0.88% and with the vaccine 0.044%. In absolute terms, the effectiveness of the vaccine is (0.88-0.044)%.

A risk reduction of approximately 0.84%. Oh! A barely perceptible “efficacy.”

Using Pfizer’s figures, the relative risk reduction is 100(1 – (0.044/0.88)). Which is 95%. Voila!

In fact, according to a scientific paper published in British Medical Journal (BMJ), entitled ‘Will covid-19 vaccines save lives? Current trials aren’t designed to tell us’, the author notes that “None of the leading COVID-19 vaccine trials are designed to detect a significant reduction in hospital admissions, admission to intensive care, or death” – See: [published 21/10/2020, accessed 15/05/2021], or download a copy of the paper here [PDF, 4 pages].

If recipients are not given full disclosure on the lack of safety data and the risks with covid vaccines, they cannot give informed consent – and this is unlawful.

“Informed consent” is a basic tenet of medical treatments and medical experimentation. Without it, we are ‘guinea pigs’ for the pharmaceutical industry. To be able to give “informed consent”, we need to know all the facts about a medical treatment or experiment, including ALL the risks and side-effects, before we give consent to be injected or swallow a pill.

The Nuremberg Code was established after World War II to ensure that informed consent was built into any medical experimentation.

The Nuremberg Code

The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential.
This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, over-reaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved, as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision.

This latter element requires that, before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject, there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person, which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment.

The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity.

The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature.

The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other problem under study, that the anticipated results will justify the performance of the experiment.

The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.

No experiment should be conducted, where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where the
experimental physicians also serve as subjects.

The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.

Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability, or death.

The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment.

During the course of the experiment, the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end, if he has reached the physical or mental state, where continuation of the experiment seemed to him to be impossible.

During the course of the experiment, the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill and careful judgement required of him, that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject.

[“Trials of War Criminals before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals under Control Council Law No. 10”, Vol. 2, pp. 181-182. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1949.]

Nuremberg Code text from: [accessed 02/05/2021], or download a copy of the Nuremberg Code text here [PDF, 1 page].

Ingredients in covid vaccines have not been fully safety checked for variabilities in manufacturing processes.

A recent report has shown that “the vaccines used against COVID were not only submitted to insufficient clinical testing, but that the quality of the active substances, their “excipients, some of which are new,” and the manufacturing processes are problematic.”

According to the CTIAP [Centre territorial d’Information indépendante et d’Avis pharmaceutiques], all of the vaccines were put on the market and actively used on human beings before “proof of quality for the active substance and the finished product” was produced: all the manufacturing labs obtained future deadlines to submit their studies in this regard.

The authors of the report consider that the “variabilities, which impact the very core of the product, could even invalidate any clinical trials conducted” in the coming months and years.

They go so far as to state: “Prudence would even dictate that, in all countries where these vaccines against COVID-19 have been marketed, all the batches thus ‘released’ should be withdrawn immediately; and that these MAs [Marketing Authorisations] that have been granted should be suspended, or even canceled, as a matter of urgency until further notice.”

Read the full article here: [published 22/04/2021, accessed 28/04/21], or download a copy of the article here [PDF, 9 pages].

Read the original report published in French by CTIAP here: [published 02/04/2021, accessed 28/04/2021], or download a copy of the French report here [PDF, 8 pages].

Not only has not enough safety and quality testing been done on vaccine ingredients, but most vaccines generally contain a long list of ingredients, some dangerous, allergy-causing or unethical, and many contain at least some of the following ingredients: aluminium, mercury (thiomersal/thimerisol), egg protein, yeast, formaldehyde, aborted foetuses (human cell lines), animal cell lines (often from the cells of an African Green Monkey or chicken embryos), GMOs (genetically modified organisms), and bovine serum (from cow blood), etc.

University of Oxford Vaccine Knowledge Group collects information on vaccine ingredients – see: [updated 11/01/2021, accessed 12/05/2021], or download a copy of the webpage here [PDF, 12 pages].

Covid vaccine manufacturers and vaccinators have ZERO liability for adverse reactions, disabilities or deaths from covid vaccines.

This is almost always the case for all vaccines, but particularly for the covid vaccines, and it is the case in many countries.

An article about the liability risk in Canada states: “Some people could suffer side effects from a COVID-19 immunization, but the vaccine manufacturers have a number of protections that minimize their liability risk, Canadian lawyers suggest.” Read the article here: [published 12/01/2021, accessed 02/05/2021], or download a copy of the article here [PDF, 2 pages].

A documentary film entitled ‘1986: The Act‘ traces developments leading up to the controversial 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act in the USA, which takes away all liability for vaccine injuries and deaths from vaccine manufacturers and their associates. See more about the film here: [accessed 12/05/2021].

Image from:

For a summary of this act and the consequences thereof, read ‘The Vaccine Injury Act , Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, and Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System‘ [PDF, 2 pages, accessed 02/05/2021]. Some key points from this are:

The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (NCVIA) was signed into law by President Ronald Reagan on November 14, 1986. The Act removed liability from vaccine manufacturers for reactions, injuries and deaths and created a federal compensation program known as the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP). The VICP was designed to be a less time-consuming and costly alternative to a vaccine injury lawsuit. However, it was made an exclusive legal remedy by the U.S. Supreme Court in 2011.

Nearly $4.3 billion has been awarded for injury and death under the VICP, according to a March 2020 report by the Health Resources and Services Administration. The program is funded by a 75-cent excise tax paid by consumers that is imposed on the purchase of each childhood vaccine recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). The pharmaceutical industry pays nothing and has zero liability for products that have hurt consumers.

When it comes to seeking compensation, parents often describe the VICP as a burdensome and emotionally draining bureaucratic program that does not afford due process; there is no judge, jury of peers or discovery, with some cases taking more than a decade to resolve. Under the program, the monetary cap for death following vaccination is $250,000.

This article considers the fact that in the UK, “There has been rapid implementation of protection from civil liability for all of those in the development, manufacture and supply of these vaccines when things go wrong, however, no counter-balance that if things do go wrong for an individual that they will also be financially protected.” See: [published 04/12/2020, accessed 02/05/2021].

Insurance policies for covid vaccine recipients may be null and void.

It is emerging that some insurance companies may be reluctant to cover covid vaccine recipients for House, Car, Health or Mortgage insurance, should they need to claim, because all covid vaccines have emergency use authorisation only and are NOT fully approved medical treatments. Hence taking an experimental medical treatment, including any of the covid vaccines, which are still in clinical trials until 2022 to 2024, may mean some insurance policies are null and void.

This very serious issue is discussed in the following video by Rolf Kane and Dolores Cahill – who encourage you to check with your insurance company:

Video link: [published 09/05/2021, accessed 11/05/2021].

Related to this, if you drive wearing a face mask (which is technically illegal in many countries, as it could impair your vision) and have an accident, your car insurance will in all likelihood be invalid.

However, having checked some of the larger UK insurer’s websites [16/05/2021], it appears that many of them will cover you with or without the covid vaccine, but there may be some issues with taking out a new policy should you have had covid, covid symptoms, or been self-isolating, etc. Considering that many new covid cases are vaccine recipients, this may indirectly impact any new insurance policies.

One of the insurance websites also noted that if your existing insurance policy excludes certain health conditions, for example, allergy, then you would not be covered if you suffered an allergic reaction to covid vaccines.

There is some anecdotal evidence emerging that private healthcare insurance companies are claiming that they will not cover injuries from their customers having taken experimental medical treatements including the current ’emergency use only’ covid jabs.

On the subject of “emergency use authorisation” (EUA) for covid vaccines, here’s a quotation taken from the Pfizer vaccine factsheet in the USA [page 6]:

The United States FDA has made the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine available under an emergency access mechanism called an EUA. The EUA is supported by a Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS) declaration that circumstances exist to justify the emergency use of drugs and biological products during the COVID-19 pandemic.

The Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine has not undergone the same type of review as an FDA-approved or cleared product. FDA may issue an EUA when certain criteria are met, which includes that there are no adequate, approved, available alternatives. In addition, the FDA decision is based on the totality of scientific evidence available showing that the product may be effective to prevent COVID-19 during the COVID-19
pandemic and that the known and potential benefits of the product outweigh the known and potential risks of the product. All of these criteria must be met to allow for the product to be used in the treatment of patients during the COVID-19 pandemic.

The EUA for the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine is in effect for the duration of the COVID-19 EUA declaration justifying emergency use of these products, unless terminated or revoked (after which the products may no longer be used).

Read the full ‘Factsheet fort Recipients and Caregivers’ published by Pfizer – see: [updated 10/05/2021, accessed 15/05/2021], or download the factsheet here [PDF, 7 pages].

Download a short summary entitled “10 Medical Facts Regarding the Covid 19 Experimental Vaccines” by Dr Shelley Cole, Medical Director of America’s Frontline Doctors (AFLDS) [PDF, 3 pages], sourced from: [accessed 17/07/2021].

Finally, this article lists 18 reasons for not getting the covid vaccine, including more details on some of those mentioned above, and some more to consider: [published 19/04/2021, accessed 25/06/2021].

Vaccine with binary numbers image by PixxlTeufel from Pixabay

Syringe image by Arek Socha from Pixabay

More Critical Reading