Covid vaccines do not stop you ‘catching’ covid, transmission to others, hospitalisations or death.
From a UK government’s Public Health England NHS leaflet about ‘Covid Vaccination’: “We do not yet know whether it will stop you from catching and passing on the virus. So, it is important to follow the guidance in your local area to protect those around you.” Download a copy of the leaflet here [PDF, 12 pages].
It has been reported that covid vaccine recipients have tested positive for covid, for example an article by standard.co.uk reports that over 500 covid vaccine recipients have been admitted to UK hospitals, having caught coronavirus after their vaccines!
See: https://www.standard.co.uk/news/uk/covid-vaccine-uk-500-admitted-hospital-b932792.html [published 01/05/2021, accessed 02/05/2021], or download the report here [PDF, 2 pages]. The article, without reference to any scientific evidence, claims or implies that these vaccine recipients must have caught covid some other way – like most mainstream media, they refuse to discuss or admit to any correlations between the vaccines and disease or death.
Another report from the USA notes how the CDC (Center for Disease Control) is making changes to how they report the high number of “breakthrough” covid cases – those which appear within two weeks AFTER vaccination – so as to hide the fact that there are such a high proportion of these. See: https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/cdc-changes-rules-counting-breakthrough-cases/ [published 07/05/2021, accessed 0/05/2021], or download a copy here [PDF, 4 pages].
In fact, it’s beginning to look like vaccines are killing people. From the UK government’s own report, published by SAGE, entitled “SPI-M-O: Summary of further modelling of easing restrictions – Roadmap Step 2, 31 March 2021”:
32. The resurgence in both hospitalisations and deaths is dominated by those that have received two doses of the vaccine [our bold], comprising around 60% and 70% of the wave respectively. This can be attributed to the high levels of uptake in the most at-risk age groups, such that immunisation failures account for more serious illness than unvaccinated individuals. This is discussed further in paragraphs 55 and 56….
56. This shows that most deaths and admissions in a post-Roadmap resurgence are in people who have received two vaccine doses, even without vaccine protection waning or a variant emerging that escapes vaccines. This is because vaccine uptake has been so high in the oldest age groups (modelled here at 95% in the over 50-year olds).
There are therefore 5% of over 50-year olds who have not been vaccinated, and 95% x 10% = 9.5% of over 50-year olds who are vaccinated but, nevertheless, not protected against death. This is not the result of vaccines being ineffective, merely uptake being so high [our bold].
Of course, it is IMPOSSIBLE to state that the majority of hospitalisations and deaths (of newly VACCINATED people) are somehow NOT due to the vaccines – how do they know? Has this been adequately investigated? Have autopsies been conducted amongst deceased vaccine recipients? The answer is NO! Thus they cannot assume hospitalisations and deaths are NOT from vaccines!
View the roadmap report here: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/spi-m-o-summary-of-further-modelling-of-easing-restrictions-roadmap-step-2-31-march-2021 [accessed 02/05/2021], or download a copy of the roadmap here [PDF, 23 pages].
AdaptNation, following on from an article in UK Column, makes the point that: “Correlation [between vaccine rollouts and increased deaths] does NOT EQUAL causation, but it would be negligent and anti-scientific to not investigate these correlations.” They go on to say:
The below graph pulls data from today’s ONS Weekly Deaths report and PHE’s Coronavirus dashboard.
80-90% of over 80’s and 50%+ of over 70 year olds have received a first dose of one of the COVID-19 vaccines.
💉 Said another way, the super majority of the most vulnerable to severe acute respiratory infection and/or vaccine injury have had at least one interaction with the experimental biologics – during the natural peaking of the Total Mortality in England/UK.
Autumn/Winter Lockdowns bookmark the divergence of Total Mortality from the 5 Year Average. Not a good story so far…
😷 All the while, robust laws on public masking, public social distancing, and a handicapped healthcare service due to onerous COVID policies.
❓How about we layer in these inputs and changes into the analysis, versus exclusively looking at data derived from the PCR Testing campaign?
🧐 Let’s be clear, there WILL be a post-mortem on the last 12 months at some point. Honest analysis and considering the impacts of all variables will be deeply scrutinised. The problem is, it will be long after the horse as bolted, and once the damage has been done.
❗️I think it’s time we see the Post-Vaccine Death figures for the UK – like the US are doing (ish). Assuming the data are non-dramatic and encouraging regarding short-term safety, it would help TREMENDOUSLY to have transparent data shared ASAP.
No one wants there to be a problem. We have the data – i.e. deaths of those who have had a vaccine dose within 28 days. So, let’s get sharing, and let’s allay the concerns and dismiss the hypotheses… #FactsNotFear
DATA SOURCES: ONS Weekly Deaths Data & PHE Coronavirus Dashboard, 2nd Feb 2021
Read the AdaptNation article here: https://adapnation.io/vaccine-mortality-correlations-without-raw-data/ [accessed 02/05/2021] and the UK Column article here: https://www.ukcolumn.org/article/why-there-correlation-between-vaccine-rollout-and-increased-covid%E2%80%9319-mortality [published 02 February 2021, accessed 02/05/2021].
There are many more adverse reactions and deaths from covid vaccines than reported in mainstream media.
Various official, government vaccine adverse event reporting databases are widely accepted to have as few as 1%-10% of all adverse events and deaths reported, and there are some discrepancies between the three major vaccine adverse reporting systems in the USA, Europe and UK, confirming under-reporting for some or all, especially VAERS in the USA.
An article in GreenMedInfo states:
According to Oxford University’s global Covid-19 vaccine tracker, as of March 27th, the US has administered over 136 million doses, which accounts for about 25 percent of all Covid-19 vaccines administered worldwide. On the other hand, the EU nations have only administered 66 million doses — less than a half compared to the US. In addition, the US vaccination rate is now approximately 41 per 100 Americans. EU nations have individually vaccinated 17 per 100 citizens or less. Therefore, why is there such an enormous discrepancy of adverse vaccine reactions between the US and EU? The EU is reporting a 0.2 percent adverse reaction rate whereas the US is claiming only 0.03 percent, almost a ten-fold difference.
Various studies have estimated that only between 1 to 10 percent of vaccine injuries are reported in VAERS. In the past, the CDC has relied upon the conservative 10 percent estimate, which may account for the ten-fold discrepancy in adverse Covid-19 vaccine events in the EU and US. A 2011 Harvard study in collaboration with the Federal Agency for Health Care Research has estimated actual adverse event reporting may be as low as 1 percent. The study states,
“Adverse events from drugs and vaccines are common, but underreported. Although 25% of ambulatory patients experience an adverse drug event, less than 0.3% of all adverse drug events and 1-13% of serious events are reported to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Likewise, fewer than 1% of vaccine adverse events are reported.”
Read the full article here: https://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/can-we-trust-americas-covid-19-vaccine-injury-statistics [published 29/03/2021, accessed 28/04/2021], or download a copy of the article here [PDF, 3 pages].
The UK MHRA’s Yellow Card Reporting System publishes a weekly report covering adverse reactions to ‘approved’ COVID-19 vaccines – See: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions [accessed 02/05/2021]. Download the weekly report ending 21/04/2021 [PDF, 18 pages].
HealthImpactNews.com monitors VAERS data from the USA, as well as MHRA data from the UK, and EudraVigilence data from Europe. For example, this article reports on the high number of adverse events and deaths in the USA, as reported on VAERS: https://healthimpactnews.com/2021/genocide-in-the-u-s-continues-3848-deaths-118902-injuries-following-covid-injections-children-now-being-reported-as-dying-also/ [published 01/05/2021, accessed 02/05/2021]. They also note that it appears that the CDC may be withholding data, as the USA numbers don’t correlate with other statistics.
Several websites monitor reports of covid vaccine side effects and deaths, including this one: https://hpv-vaccine-side-effects.com/covid-19-vaccine-side-effects-world-map/ [scroll down below their map for individual cases – accessed 02/05/2021].
A number of social media groups have been created for victims of covid vaccines and their families, where members report and discuss adverse events and deaths, most notably one group on Facebook which was removed by Facebook after it had over 100,000 members. Another group, ‘Covid Vaccine Victims‘, on Telegram has over 89,000 members: https://t.me/covidvaccinevictims [accessed 08/05/2021].
There are at least 10 mechanisms by which covid vaccines cause and will cause cross-reactions, disease or death, in the months and years to come.
Dr Sherri Tenpenny [of Tenpenny Integrative Medical Center] outlines 10 mechanisms of cross reactivity and injury of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein antigen and the anti-Spike-antibody from the mRNA experimental injections of Pfizer and Moderna biologic agents. She also outlines similar injury effects from the Johnson & Johnson (J&J) and AstraZeneca shots which use an adenovirus to deliver the spike protein into the cells.
These experimental injections have not been tested long term, nor tested for cancer causing, or effects on fertility which are all very important issues that should be tested for.
View the video at: https://www.brighteon.com/9058487e-89e0-4f83-bd0a-1dc82c46b11a [published 29/03/2021, accessed 01/05/2021].
If recipients are not given full disclosure on the lack of safety data and the high number of adverse events and deaths from covid vaccines, they cannot give informed consent – and this is unlawful.
“Informed consent” is a basic tenet of medical treatments and medical experimentation. Without it, we are ‘guinea pigs’ for the pharmaceutical industry. To be able to give “informed consent”, we need to know all the facts about a medical treatment or experiment, including ALL the risks and side-effects, before we give consent to be injected or swallow a pill.
The Nuremberg Code was established after World War II to ensure that informed consent was built into any medical experimentation.
The Nuremberg Code
The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential.
This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, over-reaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved, as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision.
This latter element requires that, before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject, there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person, which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment.
The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity.
The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature.
The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other problem under study, that the anticipated results will justify the performance of the experiment.
The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.
No experiment should be conducted, where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where the
experimental physicians also serve as subjects.
The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.
Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability, or death.
The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment.
During the course of the experiment, the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end, if he has reached the physical or mental state, where continuation of the experiment seemed to him to be impossible.
During the course of the experiment, the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill and careful judgement required of him, that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject.
[“Trials of War Criminals before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals under Control Council Law No. 10”, Vol. 2, pp. 181-182. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1949.]
Nuremberg Code text from: https://history.nih.gov/display/history/Nuremberg+Code [accessed 02/05/2021], or download a copy of the Nuremberg Code text here [PDF, 1 page].
Experimental trials for the four current covid vaccines continue until 2022 to 2024, so vaccine recipients are essentially trial participants!
According to a recent report published by CTIAP (Centre territorial d’Information indépendante et d’Avis pharmaceutiques) based on data published on the European Medicines Agency (EMA) website, covid vaccine trials will continue as follows:
The BioNTech/Pfizer vaccine received … European conditional marketing authorization on December 21, 2020. And the deadline for filing “confirmation” of efficacy, safety, and tolerability of this vaccine is “December 2023.”
The Moderna vaccine was granted marketing authorization on January 6, 2021. The deadline for filing “confirmation” of efficacy, safety, and tolerability of the vaccine is “December 2022” at the earliest.
AstraZeneca’s vaccine was granted marketing authorization on January 29, 2021. The deadline for filing “confirmation” of efficacy, safety, and tolerability of the vaccine is “March 2024.””
The Janssen [Johnson & Johnson] vaccine was granted conditional European marketing authorization on March 11, 2021. The deadline for submitting “confirmation” of the vaccine’s efficacy, safety and tolerance is “December 2023.”
See article on this: https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/french-drug-assessment-center-demands-removal-of-all-four-widely-used-covid-vaccines [published 22/04/2021, accessed 01/05/2021].
The claimed high efficacy in covid vaccine trials was based on a small number of participants with mild covid symptoms, and in reality is ‘vanishingly tiny’.
For example, for the Pfizer vaccine trial, around half of the almost 40,000 trial participants were allegedly given the Pfizer vaccine, and the other half given a placebo.
Often we are not told what the placebo is, and sometimes it is another vaccine or drug which causes adverse events, thus diluting the adverse events experienced by the vaccine recipient group.
The claimed 90% efficacy of the Pfizer vaccine related to the fact that 90% of the around 100 or so people who got mild covid symptoms – from the original 40,000 – came from the placebo group. Read that again! See: https://adapnation.io/what-you-need-to-know-about-the-pfizer-mrna-vaccine/ [published 09/11/2020, accessed 01/05/2021].
This article explains in more depth the magic tricks employed by vaccine manufacturers in calculating their claimed high efficacy for their experimental vaccine trials – See: https://in-this-together.com/vaccine-trials/ [published 23/12/2020, accessed 02/05/2021], or download a copy of the article here [PDF, 10 pages]. The author notes that for the Pfizer covid vaccine trial, for example, the true efficacy was less than 1%, and not the [later] reported 95%. This is how they do it:
The absolute risk of developing COVID 19 symptoms without the vaccine is supposedly 0.88% and with the vaccine 0.044%. In absolute terms, the effectiveness of the vaccine is (0.88-0.044)%.
A risk reduction of approximately 0.84%. Oh! A barely perceptible “efficacy.”
Using Pfizer’s figures, the relative risk reduction is 100(1 – (0.044/0.88)). Which is 95%. Voila!
Ingredients in covid vaccines have not been fully safety checked for variabilities in manufacturing processes.
A recent report has shown that “the vaccines used against COVID were not only submitted to insufficient clinical testing, but that the quality of the active substances, their “excipients, some of which are new,” and the manufacturing processes are problematic.”
According to the CTIAP [Centre territorial d’Information indépendante et d’Avis pharmaceutiques], all of the vaccines were put on the market and actively used on human beings before “proof of quality for the active substance and the finished product” was produced: all the manufacturing labs obtained future deadlines to submit their studies in this regard.
The authors of the report consider that the “variabilities, which impact the very core of the product, could even invalidate any clinical trials conducted” in the coming months and years.
They go so far as to state: “Prudence would even dictate that, in all countries where these vaccines against COVID-19 have been marketed, all the batches thus ‘released’ should be withdrawn immediately; and that these MAs that have been granted should be suspended, or even canceled, as a matter of urgency until further notice.”
Read the full article here: https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/french-drug-assessment-center-demands-removal-of-all-four-widely-used-covid-vaccines [published 22/04/2021, accessed 28/04/21], or download a copy of the article here [PDF, 9 pages].
Read the original report published in French by CTIAP here: https://ctiapchcholet.blogspot.com/2021/04/inedit-exclusif-vaccins-contre-la-covid.html [published 02/04/2021, accessed 28/04/2021], or download a copy of the French report here [PDF, 8 pages].
Covid vaccine manufacturers and vaccinators have no liability for adverse reactions, disabilities or deaths from covid vaccines.
This is almost always the case for all vaccines, but particularly for the covid vaccines, and it is the case in many countries.
For example, an article about the liability risk in Canada states: “Some people could suffer side effects from a COVID-19 immunization, but the vaccine manufacturers have a number of protections that minimize their liability risk, Canadian lawyers suggest.” Read the article here: https://www.canadianunderwriter.ca/claims/how-covid-19-vaccine-side-effects-impact-liability-risk-1004202366/ [published 12/01/2021, accessed 02/05/2021], or download a copy of the article here [PDF, 2 pages].
For the USA, read about ‘The Vaccine Injury Act , Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, and Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System‘ [PDF, 2 pages, accessed 02/05/2021].
This article considers the fact that in the UK, “There has been rapid implementation of protection from civil liability for all of those in the development, manufacture and supply of these vaccines when things go wrong, however, no counter-balance that if things do go wrong for an individual that they will also be financially protected.” See: https://www.leighday.co.uk/latest-updates/blog/2020-blogs/vaccine-producers-given-immunity-from-civil-liability/ [published 04 December 2020, accessed 02/05/2021].
Finally, this article lists 18 reasons for not getting the covid vaccine, including those mentioned above and more: https://www.deconstructingconventional.com/post/18-reason-i-won-t-be-getting-a-covid-vaccine [published 19/04/2021, accessed 02/05/2021].